Reconstruction · 2022 NCAA Championships
2022 team scores
The team standings fans should quote are the NCAA’s published ones. This page shows the working behind them: every program’s points recomputed from the recorded match rows, and how close that comes to the published total.
Reconstructed points against the published standings
Points are recomputed from the 2022 recorded match rows under the 2016 rules: advancement (including byes), bonus, guaranteed-place increments, and any curated adjustments. 59 of 66 programs match the published total exactly; 7 differ; 6 are not listed in the published standings.
| Rank | Program | Reconstructed | Advancement | Bonus | Placement | Adjustments | Published place | Published points | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penn State | 131.5 | 26 | 16.5 | 89 | 0 | 1 | 131.5 | 0 |
| 2 | Michigan | 95 | 25.5 | 11.5 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 95 | 0 |
| 3 | Iowa | 74 | 22.5 | 9.5 | 42 | 0 | 3 | 74 | 0 |
| 4 | Arizona State | 67 | 18.5 | 12.5 | 36 | 0 | 4 | 66.5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | Nebraska | 59.5 | 19.5 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 5 | 59.5 | 0 |
| 6 | Northwestern (IL) | 57.5 | 15.5 | 7 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 57.5 | 0 |
| 7 | Cornell (NY) | 54.5 | 17.5 | 8 | 29 | 0 | 7 | 54.5 | 0 |
| 8 | Virginia Tech | 52.5 | 15.5 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 8 | 52.5 | 0 |
| 9 | Missouri | 50.5 | 14.5 | 11 | 25 | 0 | 9 | 49.5 | +1 |
| 10 | North Carolina State | 49 | 16.5 | 11.5 | 21 | 0 | 10 | 49 | 0 |
| 11 | Minnesota | 48.5 | 10.5 | 11 | 27 | 0 | 11 | 48.5 | 0 |
| 12 | Oregon State | 45.5 | 17.5 | 9 | 19 | 0 | 12 | 44.5 | +1 |
| 13 | Ohio State | 44 | 16 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 13 | 44 | 0 |
| 14 | Oklahoma State | 38.5 | 12.5 | 8 | 18 | 0 | T14 | 38.5 | 0 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 38.5 | 10.5 | 9 | 19 | 0 | T14 | 38.5 | 0 |
| 16 | Princeton (NJ) | 38 | 10 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 16 | 38 | 0 |
| 16 | Iowa State | 38 | 9.5 | 7.5 | 21 | 0 | 17 | 37 | +1 |
| 18 | Stanford (CA) | 32.5 | 9.5 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 19 | 31.5 | +1 |
| 19 | North Carolina | 32 | 11 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 32 | 0 |
| 20 | Northern Iowa | 28.5 | 11.5 | 7 | 10 | 0 | T20 | 28.5 | 0 |
| 20 | Rutgers (NJ) | 28.5 | 10 | 5.5 | 13 | 0 | T20 | 28.5 | 0 |
| 22 | California-Poly | 28 | 8 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 22 | 28 | 0 |
| 23 | Wyoming | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 23 | 21 | 0 |
| 24 | Pittsburgh (PA) | 20.5 | 9.5 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 24 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 25 | Illinois | 17.5 | 5.5 | 5 | 7 | 0 | T25 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 25 | Lehigh (PA) | 17.5 | 5.5 | 2 | 10 | 0 | T25 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 27 | Pennsylvania | 15.5 | 8.5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 27 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 28 | Appalachian State (NC) | 13.5 | 5.5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 28 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 29 | Oklahoma | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 11 | +1 |
| 30 | Purdue (IN) | 10.5 | 7.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T30 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 30 | Virginia | 10.5 | 7.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T30 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 32 | West Virginia | 9.5 | 4.5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 8.5 | +1 |
| 33 | Drexel (PA) | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 8 | 0 |
| 34 | North Dakota State | 7.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 35 | Rider (NJ) | 6 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 6 | 0 |
| 36 | Air Force (CO) | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T36 | 5 | 0 |
| 36 | Binghamton (NY) | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T36 | 5 | 0 |
| 36 | Campbell (NC) | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T36 | 5 | 0 |
| 39 | Central Michigan | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T39 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 39 | Northern Illinois | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T39 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 41 | Army (NY) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T41 | 4 | 0 |
| 41 | Citadel (SC) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T41 | 4 | 0 |
| 41 | Michigan State | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T41 | 4 | 0 |
| 44 | Northern Colorado | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T44 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 44 | South Dakota State | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T44 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 46 | Bloomsburg (PA) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T46 | 3 | 0 |
| 46 | Clarion (PA) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T46 | 3 | 0 |
| 48 | Bucknell (PA) | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 48 | Duke (NC) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 48 | Maryland | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 48 | Navy (MD) | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 52 | Harvard (MA) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T52 | 2 | 0 |
| 52 | Utah Valley | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T52 | 2 | 0 |
| 54 | Columbia (NY) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T54 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 54 | Lock Haven (PA) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T54 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 56 | California-Bakersfield | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Cleveland State (OH) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Indiana (IN) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Kent State (OH) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Tennessee-Chattanooga | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 61 | Buffalo (NY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Edinboro (PA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Franklin & Marshall (PA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Gardner-Webb (NC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Hofstra (NY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
Difference is the reconstruction minus the published total. Rank is the program’s position among reconstructed totals, which can differ from its published place.
Published standings: NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships Records Book, All-Time Team Results, 2022. Programs the book lists without an archive entry that year are not shown.